The Actuary Magazine

Raymond Tam, FSA, led the development of insurance and pension regulations in Hong Kong before retiring in 2020. Here, he shares his insights on the technical development of the Hong Kong market.

First, could you tell us a bit about yourself?

Raymond Tam, FSA

I began my actuarial career in 1979 with life insurance companies in Canada and the United States. While vacationing in Hong Kong in 1987, I made cold calls to three actuaries asking about actuarial opportunities and got two job offers. At the time, I was concerned about the crime rate in Philadelphia, so I moved back home to work as an actuarial consultant in life insurance and pensions.

In 1992, I joined the OCI and soon became the first local-born actuary to serve as assistant commissioner of Insurance (long-term business). As the OCI was only established in 1990, there were no insurance regulations other than the HK$2 million solvency margin. Actuaries were free to choose the reserving methods and assumptions.  So I designed life insurance regulations based on Solvency 1 and the appointed actuary system. As the only FSA in the OCI, I needed help from a strong actuarial professional. I urged the Actuarial Association of Hong Kong to reconstitute into the Actuarial Society of Hong Kong and worked on the first Hong Kong statutory mortality table. After completing Solvency 1 in 1995, I was reassigned to design Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) scheme regulations. In 1998, I joined the new pension regulator Mandatory Provident Fund Scheme Authority as executive director.

After China joined the World Trade Organization, opening up its insurance market, I moved to Shanghai in 2002 to work in a new JV life insurance company. I was invited by the Chinese Insurance Regulatory Commission (CIRC) to join the Actuarial Expert Panel and participated in setting up the China Association of Actuaries. I was in charge of setting up the pension track for actuarial exams and training the first pension actuaries in China. I was the first recipient of the Actuary of the Year Award in China in 2012.

In 2014, I moved back to the Hong Kong regional office working as the chief risk officer (CRO) for Asia. In 2017, I joined the new Insurance Authority as executive director in charge of policy development, including the design of RBC, InsurTech and insurance legislation. I built up the actuarial team before my retirement in 2020.

Given your experience, you have participated in and witnessed generational change in Hong Kong. Could you share with us the demographic and customer trends in Hong Kong today?

Hong Kong has the world’s highest life expectancy and the third-lowest fertility rate, resulting in a rapidly aging population. As the designer of the MPF scheme regulations, I think that the 10% monthly MPF contributions would be inadequate for the retirement needs of most workers. Therefore, many people buy life insurance to save for retirement.

The first foreign insurance company in China was established in 1805, offering general insurance. Foreign companies later expanded into life insurance, but exclusively for foreigners. In 1919, C.V. Starr founded what later became AIG in Shanghai, trying to sell life insurance to the locals. But Chinese people were not interested in life insurance with a payout only upon death. So, Starr invented insurance products with periodic living benefits, and he became very successful. This concept of using life insurance for savings became deeply entrenched. Today in Hong Kong, the dominant products are still whole-life or endowment products with periodic living benefits, particularly favored by older generations.

The younger generations are more health-conscious and have a preference for health insurance, as Hong Kong has the second-most expensive private health care in the world after the United States. Public hospitals are extremely crowded, with 90% of patients served by only 45% of doctors and monthslong waits for services like surgeries. Critical illness coverage is very popular for the younger generations and is either embedded in the insurance policy or as a rider.

In 2019, the government introduced the tax-deductible Voluntary Health Insurance Scheme (VHIS), which encouraged the purchase of approved hospital indemnity insurance plans to divert people away from public hospitals and to private health care. VHIS plans are very popular with younger generations.

Apart from demographics, could you also share more on insurance penetration in the Hong Kong market and further elaborate on the central issues observed in the industry?

Hong Kong has the world’s highest life insurance penetration of 19.4%, and together with nonlife penetration of 2.2%, Hong Kong also has the world’s highest insurance penetration of 21.6%.

This high life insurance penetration is mainly due to the 120,000 licensed individual insurance intermediaries (as of June 2022), or 3.3% of the working population engaged in selling insurance, which is among the highest proportion in the world. There were 1,075,080 new individual life insurance policies sold in 2021 (which translated to 14% of the population, compared to about 3% in the United States or the United Kingdom). Most of the policies are regular premium whole-life policies, which contributed to the high insurance penetration from in-force business renewal premiums.

Despite having the world’s highest life insurance penetration, Hong Kong has an issue of mortality protection gap of HK$6.9 trillion or about HK$2 million per working person, according to a protection gap study released by the Insurance Authority in 2021. Although Hong Kong has the world’s most expensive residential property market, mortgage protection coverage is rarely used, as it is not required by banks. Hong Kong is one of the world’s most expensive places for children’s education, but people only think about using insurance to save money rather than taking out sufficient coverage for premature death. The large number of insurance agents with less than one new policy per month on average cannot be sustained by selling term coverage. Term life constituted about 0.5% of new business premiums, contributing to the high protection gap.

Most of the life insurance policies are participating policies. Some insurers used aggressive investment return assumptions leading to high policy values in policy illustration. The Actuarial Society of Hong Kong has raised the issue of potential unhealthy competition on the assumed rates of return and asked the Insurance Authority to issue guidelines for actuaries to use in policy illustration.

The general insurance sector contributed about 10% of premiums of the industry, divided among 100 insurers. Many players are too small to achieve economies of scale, straining the profitability of the sector. Some actuaries were under pressure to underestimate claim reserves and premium rates. The general insurance actuaries of the Insurance Authority started to review claim reserves, leading to strengthening of reserves and premium rates, resulting in improvements in the combined ratio of the sector.

You shared that Hong Kong has the highest life insurance penetration rate in the world. Could you please share with us the primary products sold in the market? What are the leading platforms or channels preferred in the industry?

The primary products sold in the market are whole life (about 75% measured by annualized premiums) followed by endowment (about 20%). These products often have some form of periodic benefits and are packaged with embedded benefits or riders, like critical illness or hospital indemnity insurance. Market share of term life insurance is only about 0.5% (compared to 20% in the United States).

The leading channel is bancassurance, with about 18,000 licensed technical representatives of the banks producing 41% of premiums. The agency channel had about 90,000 licensed individual insurance intermediaries producing 37% of premiums. The brokerage channel produced 19% and the remaining 4% was from online or direct marketing. The average premium size and lower productivity of insurance agents compared to bank tellers indicate that many insurance agents are part-timers.

The primary bancassurance products are endowments of shorter maturity, with higher rates of return than term deposits but stiff penalties on early surrender. Premium financing is often used with loans from banks on floating interest rates. The Insurance Authority and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority had issued guidelines on premium financing, which is timely, as the U.S. Fed is rapidly raising interest rates, which Hong Kong was expected to follow sooner or later due to the currency peg. The primary products sold by individual insurance agents are whole-life products.

The digital channel has less than 2% market share from five new virtual insurers and a number of multi-channel insurers. The big life players with sizable agency forces might not be too keen on developing the digital channel so as to avoid channel conflicts with their agency channels.

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority is active in developing digital banking and has pushed for the adoption of OpenAPI to facilitate digital banking by four phases and is now already moving into the fourth phase. Development in the digital channel of insurers could be enhanced when the Insurance Authority rolls out OpenAPI.

Most policies were denominated in USD (72%) followed by HKD (23%) in 2021. Insurance companies offered higher investment return on USD policies for several reasons. USD debt securities often have a higher yield than HKD securities. HKD fixed-income securities in longer durations are in short supply, so insurance companies would have to invest in USD securities with additional costs of currency swaps, and longer swaps are not even available. Many HKD debt securities are not rated, thus attracting higher capital charges. It is easier to manage a portfolio of USD fixed-income securities than HKD. Policyholders would favor the higher return on USD policies without worrying about currency risk because of the currency peg.

You’ve discussed the customer demographics, penetration rate and popular products. Now can you provide an overview of major players in the Hong Kong insurance market?

The life insurance market used to be dominated by foreign players operating as subsidiaries of the world’s leading insurance groups. This has gradually evolved into regionalization, with Hong Kong as the insurance center for the Asia region or even worldwide operations. We now have three insurance groups headquartered in Hong Kong under the group-wide supervision of the Insurance Authority.

The bancassurance channel, with 41% premiums, is dominated by players connected to leading banks, particularly bank-note issuing banks. The agency channel, with 37% premiums, is led by players with sizable tied agencies. Finally, the brokerage channel with 19% is more relied upon by the medium-sized players to complement their own tied agencies. Chinese players are also gaining market share.

The life market is more concentrated and dominated by the top dozen or so life players, with the remaining players each having a market share of less than 1%. The nonlife market is less concentrated, with over 100 nonlife players. The top 10 players have a 42% market share, and a number of these are foreign players. The next 10 players have a 21% market share, and the rest are smaller and mostly local players.

The new requirements under the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 17 and risk-based capital (RBC) are likely to raise the business volume of smaller players to achieve economies of scale.

Hong Kong has a key role in the development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area (GBA) including the area of insurance. The insurance penetration rate of China is much lower than that of Hong Kong. There will be huge future growth opportunities as the integration between Hong Kong and the GBA continue to develop.

Are there any recent regulatory or compliance changes that heavily impact the insurance market in Hong Kong?

Insurers around the world are heavily affected by IFRS 17, and Hong Kong is no exception. While foreign players have global resources, many smaller local players were not ready for IFRS 17 and wanted a later implementation date similar to some other countries. The Insurance Authority, together with the industry, had lobbied for a phase-in implementation for the smaller players. Fortunately, the effective date was deferred by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to Jan. 1, 2022, and eventually to Jan. 1 2023, providing more time for preparation.

The current solvency regime of Hong Kong came into being in 1995 when I was the assistant commissioner. There are major shortcomings, particularly in life insurance. On the liability side, net premium valuation tied to risk-free rates led to depressed solvency when interest rates were low. On the asset side, the flat 4% solvency charge is grossly inadequate. My most urgent task in the Insurance Authority was to develop the RBC solvency regime. The RBC solvency regime, the Hong Kong version of Solvency 2, will heavily impact the insurance market in Hong Kong.

Recognizing that IFRS 17 and RBC will be more challenging to local players and smaller insurers, the Insurance Authority worked with the industry body Hong Kong Federation of Insurers (HKFI) to help the industry. The HKFI provided a series of IFRS17 training sessions to insurance companies. The HKFI also worked with the Actuarial Society of Hong Kong to provide a draft template for the own risk solvency assessment (ORSA) report. There are also actuarial consultancies that provide packaged technical services more suitable for smaller players whose resources are more restrained.

We understand that Hong Kong has done relatively well in containing the spread of COVID-19 as compared to many other countries. Could you share the impact that COVID-19 has had on Hong Kong and any lessons learned?

Hong Kong did relatively well in containing the spread of COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021, with only a handful of new local cases or even no new local cases for many consecutive days. Based on this experience, a local insurer offered customers applying for insurance between Jan. 1 and March 31, 2022, free COVID coverage of HK$180,000 if infected on or before April 30, 2022.

With Omicron, new cases started to grow and exceeded 1,000 new cases on Feb. 9, 2022. Two days later, the insurer reduced the COVID coverage to HK$2,800, a reduction of 98.5% or 64 times. By April 30, 2022, Hong Kong had 1.2 million reported and confirmed cases and even up to as many as 4 million cases were not reported.

There are lessons to be learned in this case. Actuaries should not rely only on local experience data of two years for COVID, known to come up with new variants that are more contagious. Even before the insurer launched free COVID coverage, Omicron was found to be more contagious and already spreading rapidly around the world in December 2021. Interestingly, both the chief actuary and CEO are FSAs. Fortunately, this is only an isolated case.

COVID did not cause solvency issues for insurers, as it did in Taiwan. There was one general insurer that became insolvent but unrelated to COVID. Premiums of the general insurance sector continued to grow in 2020 and 2021. Underwriting profits also increased as economic activities were subdued by COVID, leading to lower claims.

The life insurance sector is more affected by COVID due to the loss of business from Mainland Chinese visitors. Players with Macau operations diverted some Mainland Chinese visitors to Macau where the border was still open.

Insurance intermediaries were affected by COVID, as some customers were concerned about face-to-face meetings with them. To address this issue, the Insurance Authority rolled out a range of temporary facilitative measures to enable intermediaries to distribute protection-type products while avoiding face-to-face interactions, such as digital, telemarketing, postal or video call applications.

Premiums of new life insurance business from local customers actually increased slightly in 2020 and substantially in 2021. The income of individual insurance agents was cushioned by renewal commissions as they were selling mainly regular premium whole life products. Bancassurance agents are banking staff where banking services were their main duties with limited impact from lower insurance sales. As a result, the number of licensed individual insurance intermediaries remained rather stable in 2020 and 2021 at around 120,000.

One implication from COVID-19 that has been brought up is the use of technology. Together with the fact that Hong Kong is the leading financial center in the region, do you have any insights on the insurance innovations and technology shifts in the Hong Kong market recently?

When I was in charge of InsurTech at the Insurance Authority, I came up with two new initiatives:

  1. Fast-track approval of new virtual insurers
  2. InsurTech Sandbox

There are now four new virtual insurers approved under the fast track. After the entrance of these new virtual insurers, the big players increased investment in technology and raised the caliber of their “chief technology officer.”

The industry body Hong Kong Federation of Insurers (HKFI) was also very supportive and proactive in using insurance innovations and technology to serve the industry. HKFI launched a motor insurance platform, the Motor Insurance DLT-based Authentication System (MIDAS), that harnessed blockchain to ensure the authenticity of motor insurance policies to address the issue of fake policies from illegal insurance brokers.

Another innovation of the HKFI is the launch of the Insurance Fraud Prevention Claims Database (IFPCD), using state-of-the-art artificial intelligence technology to detect insurance fraud, particularly those involving multiple claims and syndicates. IFPCD would cover auto, medical and personal accident insurance. Succeeding phases will cover segments including life and travel insurance.

Hong Kong also benefits from next door neighbor Shenzhen, the Silicon Valley of China, which provides some of the leading insurance innovations and technologies as well as talent.

What is your view on the potential challenges and opportunities for the Hong Kong insurance industry in the future?

A major challenge is to cope with IFRS 17 and RBC at the same time, both involve a lot of actuarial work and need a lot of actuaries. The Insurance Authority is pushing for a short transition period of three years. While local and Chinese players want to have more time to get prepared, foreign players who are already under Solvency 2 or RBC regimes in their home jurisdictions want to have early adoption of RBC to streamline their work.

This could be more challenging for general insurers with more than 100 players in a modest-sized market. We expect to see some consolidation activities where smaller players might team up with others to achieve better economies of scale. This could, in turn, improve the overall profitability of the industry with more growth opportunities.

There are also opportunities for insurers to use innovations and technology in the agency channel. The current productivity of less than one new life insurance policy per agent per month means a lot of opportunities to grow from this low base. The market share for term insurance of 0.67% has the potential to grow to 20% in the United States.

You have had the privilege to work and live in different countries. Could you provide some advice for actuaries interested in moving to Hong Kong?

Despite being the place with the most SOA members outside of the United States and Canada, Hong Kong still has a shortage of actuaries. There are opportunities to work on IFRS17 and RBC for people with varying levels of experience, from fresh graduates to seasoned professionals. The working environment for actuaries in Hong Kong is more challenging than in other countries that have well-established procedures and manuals. You may encounter problems with too many options to choose from or no precedents to follow. You may want to have discussions with colleagues before deciding on the option to choose. We have longer office hours, and it is normal to work overtime, but Hong Kong is an exciting place to live.

As a leading insurance hub, Hong Kong has 13 of the world’s top 20 insurance groups operating, many with their regional and global headquarters here. Many C-suite roles are occupied by actuaries, including CEO, CFO, COO, CIO, CDO and CMO. There are more opportunities open to actuaries compared to other places, so you may stick with traditional roles or try less traditional roles for actuaries. You can choose between breadth (e.g., working in headquarters) or depth (e.g., focusing on Hong Kong).

Raymond Tam, FSA, retired in 2020. Previously, he was an executive director of the Insurance Authority, leading the design of the new RBC regime for Hong Kong and held leading positions in insurance companies and actuarial consultancies in Hong Kong and China. He was the recipient of China’s first Actuary of the Year Award in 2012.
Jan Hou Chong, FSA, is a CRO and senior vice president at Thai Life Insurance Public Company Limited.

Statements of fact and opinions expressed herein are those of the individual authors and are not necessarily those of the Society of Actuaries or the respective authors’ employers.

Q&A with Haris Sardar, FSA, FCIA, Canadian actuary and artist

English Version 对话未来:寿险经营回归本源的发力点探讨。 寿险经营转型升级是一个艰难过程,行业重新洗牌也在所难免,但无论多难,行业都有一个共识,就是回归保险本源的大势不可逆转。在复杂分化的过程中,寿险企业唯有持续坚定地回归保障本源,寿险业的高质量发展之路才能越走越宽、越走越远。以下将从股东、战略、效率三个维度出发,探讨寿险经营回归本源的发力点。 股东上:回归从资本效率出发,做百年寿险 回归资本效率 过去,寿险业一直在宣传8年盈利的行业规律,这其实反映了寿险行业经营模式的误区,因为无论是8年还是8分钟的利益博弈都会产生极端的情况。第一种情况是缺乏经验的股东遇上会讲故事的管理层,虽然前几年处于亏损状态,但是管理层会用“8年期限未到,还没迎来真正的收益期”的言论来说服股东,这就导致年年亏损直到8年期限到了之后,才发现人去楼空,资本亏损。另一种情况是缺乏耐性的股东无法等待8年盈利行业规律,迫不及待地想要实现巨大目标,不论是资产上还是盈利上的目标,所以倒逼着管理层走向了另一条激进模式,造成行业乱象。保单不应是单纯的理财工具,因此寿险行业需要有耐心、负责任、愿意长期从事保险业的股东入局,让潜在投资主体回归资本效率。 保持合理杠杆率 在偿二代二期工程的监管规则下,实际资本的认定愈加审慎,保险公司所面临的偿付能力压力相对更大,一部分公司核心偿付能力充足率出现下降,因此,相较于偿二代一期的监管,保险公司经营杠杆的资本约束更大。实际上,大多数公司,包括一期下资本结构优良的公司,在二期规则下,如何高效经营都是一个新的课题。因此,为保持偿付能力充足率的稳定,保险公司应保持合理的杠杆率。 理性判断市场机遇 实际上,保险业转型的混乱与困境中也蕴藏着无限的机遇。如果能够正确地应对困难、调整认知偏差,那么对于潜在股东来说,这也是一个机遇再来期。因为保险市场俨然进入“冷静期”,保险牌照申请也进入了冷静期,价格逐渐回归合理预期,市场对保险的盈利预期也更加理性清晰。因此无论是挑人,挑牌照还是挑模式,现在都是最好的时机来打造百年寿险事业。 战略上:回归依托资源禀赋,锚定客群 要在战略上找到发力点,关键在于对自我认知的程度,在前文也对目前转型升级所面临的三大误区进行了详细的梳理,在抓住战略机遇这一点,有两个方面需要关注。 分析底层资源禀赋 整体来看,许多地方中小银行比地方中小险企发展更好的原因在于地方银行是深耕县域蓝海,专注服务地方发展。大多数中小险企在创立初期就树立了很远大的理想,希望覆盖全中国甚至触达海外市场,很少有只扎根当地城市的企业。但在海外市场,诸如美国、英国等都能够容纳数量庞大的地方中小险企。而且,不少险企极大地忽略了“地方”的优势,毕竟地方政府、地方金融企业是十分愿意支持地方险企的发展,所以理论上来说,客户资源和经营渠道是足够支撑地方险企的成长的。因此,如果地方险企愿意深耕当地市场的话,还是有许多红利可以挖掘的。成功的方法论很简单,但成功从来不是一蹴而就的,不同企业通往成功的道路都不尽相同,关键在于如何因地制宜地用心去实践。因此,着眼于当下,学习地方中小银行,利用好地方资源,服务地区企业、客户,根据可用资源明确目标细分市场,积极搭建行业壁垒是成功的关键因素。 以客户为中心 坚持长期主义,摒弃传统的单一渠道战略开发,构建以客户为中心的多渠道模式,才是正确的经营模式。以职域营销为例,虽然早在2005年左右,许多险企已经开始讨论职域营销,但是一直到如今都没有能够真正掌握精髓的企业出现。究其原因,是对职域营销的模式精髓没有吃透,三种模式带来三种结果: 第一种是传统的转介绍模式,即团险的业务经理将个险的优秀代理人介绍给企业,通过团险的关系资源将客户带到公司之后就完成了任务。此时客户与代理人之间仍存在着巨大的陌生感,互动较少,堪比陌拜,结果可想而知,最终谈成业务的案例屈指可数。 第二种是典型的产说会团购模式,即训练有B端客户的内勤开拓资源、搭建平台、开拓个险业务,将团体客户经理训练成开发个单的人。同时通过低价的重疾险或其他资源的加持抓住流量,实现短期的增长。但真正实践过个险的都知道,这种快速流量的模式并不是长远之计,当流量扫光后便会进入停滞期并最终陷入困境。而且真正的精英营销员并不是单靠训练就可以的,很大一部分是需要天赋的,并不是提供客户资源加训练就能把普通人都变成销售高手的。 第三种就是以客户为中心的模式,让训练有素的个险营销员精英直接经营团险,以经营团险为主,通过口碑带来个险业务。个团一体化。以团为始,以个为终,形成正循环。 因此,回归本源其一则应该要继续坚持初心,颠覆重渠道、轻客户的局面,打通并融合各个渠道,实现一体化运营,把满足客户需求和保障客户利益放到第一位,为客户提供更好的产品和服务。 效率上:回归有效益的经营,成本效益最大化 在经历了“先做大再做强”的时代之后,保险公司应回归经营的永恒主题:成本效益最大化,这对于任何类型的行业来说都是亘古不变的主题。具体来说,也分为客户成本、渠道成本、运营成本三个方面来提高整体的效率,回归有效益的经营。 客户成本:在行业长期低增长的“存量时代”,客户黏性下滑、获客成本高企、风控能力缺失等挑战日益凸显,要控制客户成本是最为困难的。但在中国高强度的监管政策下,客户成本、利差损风险在一定程度上还是能够把控住的。 渠道成本:渠道成本相对来说是较为容易控制的,要防止渠道铺摊式扩张,避免以增员为名义的大规模套利,尤其是新建公司更需要避免,否则会导致供给端严重过剩。举例来说,新加坡500万的高收入人口只能支撑起16家寿险公司,而收入相对低的成都的城镇人口大约800-900万,但是寿险公司至少有50多家,其中有30家在经营代理人渠道,这是严重的供给过剩,导致渠道成本居高不下。 运营成本:前文也提过,目前效率低下的很大原因在于内外勤等成本的投入过高,行业所供养的100万内勤、450万代理人、5万的机构实际上成果产出十分有限。因此要从整个行业规模出发来减少机构层级,减少冗余成本,同时也应减少后援等支持部门的成本,实现自动化、科技化、外包化、一岗复用的高效运营。 总结 寿险经营回归本源之路道阻且长,但未来可期,在明确顶层设计与战略规划、突破思维认知困局、夯实建设根基等三方面的赋能下,寿险行业一定会跨越转型阵痛期,并在未来促进民生保障中、在投身国家战略中都能够与经济社会发展同频共振,占领存量时代的客户高地,再造下一个黄金时代。 崔巍, FSA, 中信保诚人寿保险有限公司副总经理。 以上陈述及评论仅为作者个人观点,不代表北美精算师协会(SOA)或其相关雇主言论和观点。

Chinese Version As stated in Part 2 of this article, the transformation and upgrading of the life insurance business is a difficult process. A reshuffling of the industry is inevitable, but no matter how difficult it is, there is a consensus among industry professionals that the trend of returning to the roots of insurance is…